No one can deny the freedom you feels when tearing down the highway at 80 mph with the wind whipping through your hair. But considering the fact tha over 90% of all motorcycle fatalities are due to severe head injuries, it will give one reason for pause.

In many countries, wearing a motorcycle helmet is comparable to wearing seatbelts. It's just simply the law. Yes, in truth wearing a helmet will not guarantee pure salvation. But when used, it can only lessen the severity and increase the chance of survival. To understanding a helmet's function, it's important to know how fatal head injuries can happen in an accident. The most important thing about head injuries is to stop skull fragments from piercing the tissues of the brain, until then, most head injuries are not as fatal you would think. A full-blown impact on head can lead to permanent malfunctioning of the body system. Wearing a helmet gives you the best chance to avoid this outcome.

 

Another example of a fatal head injury is when the brain is stirred, yet there is no open wound in the head. In this case, the brain bumps the inside of the skull leading to small, yet deadly movements and rotation causing internal bleeding. Wearing properly designed D.O.T. motorcycle helmet will help absorb the shock in the head after it sinks to its protective cushions. Helmet design considerations are about the tolerable impact the head can handle. The soft linings inside the helmet helps provide brain protection, and the exterior of the helmet helps protect against puncture wounds.

Fact:

• 20 states (including District of Columbia) have a law requiring motorcyclists to wear a helmet.
• 26 states have laws requiring only some motorcyclists to wear a helmet.
• 4 states have no motorcycle helmet laws. (CO, IL, IA & NH)

The history of motorcycle helmet laws in the United States is characterized by change. In 1967, to increase motorcycle helmet use, the federal government required the states to enact helmet use laws in order to qualify for certain federal safety programs and highway construction funds. The federal incentive worked. By the early 1970s, almost all the states had universal motorcycle helmet laws ("universal" in the sense that they covered all riders). Michigan was the first state to repeal its law in 1968, beginning a pattern of repeal, reenactment, and amendment of motorcycle helmet laws. In 1976, states successfully lobbied Congress to stop the Department of Transportation from assessing financial penalties on states without helmet laws. By 1980, most states had repealed or limited their motorcycle helmet laws to cover riders younger than 18, but not older riders. Later states that had repealed the law, reinstated it but only for young riders. All but 4 states now require some or all motorcyclists to wear helmets. (Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, and New Hampshire don't have helmet laws.) Since 1997, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, and Texas have changed their laws covering all riders to apply only to young riders. And most recently, Louisiana moved from a partial to a universal motorcycle helmet law.

The changes in helmet laws have created a natural laboratory for researchers to study the effects of the laws on helmet use rates and on motorcycle deaths and head injuries. Helmet use rates approach 100 percent under universal laws (currently, in 20 states and the District of Columbia), but partial laws that cover only some motorcyclists (currently, in 26 states) are widely disobeyed. Repeatedly, research has shown that universal helmet laws reduce deaths and serious injuries among motorcyclists. The sharp reductions in helmet use resulting from weakening or repealing motorcycle helmet laws are followed by significant increases in injuries and deaths. Research in Texas is illustrative. The universal helmet law in Texas is estimated to have saved 650 lives between 1968 when it went into effect and 1977 when it was first amended. The amended law covered only riders younger than 18 and its enactment was followed by a 35 percent increase in motorcyclist fatalities. Texas reinstated universal coverage in 1989. Helmet use which had dropped to 41 percent under the partial law, promptly rose to 98 percent and serious injury crashes per registered motorcycle decreased by 11 percent. The pattern repeated in 1997 when Texas again rolled back the law to apply only to riders younger than 21. In less than a year, helmet use was down to 66 percent, and operator fatalities increased 31 percent in the first full year of the new law.